CRYSTALDISKMARKWINDOWS 10 64 BIT PORTABLE

Want to find a music file to play? Wait at least 30 seconds. However, the 192GB dual card in the PSP was so slow that it made using the PSP an onerous chore. The PSP correctly reported 175GB of free space, which is close to the expected amount. 128GB + 64GB = 192GB, but we must subtract about 7% for OS formatting reasons.

The PSP finally recognized the card, but only 175GB of free space was available.

CRYSTALDISKMARKWINDOWS 10 64 BIT PORTABLE

Given the past success of using multiple MicroSD cards with the PlayStation Portable (PSP), I thought, “Why not combine the Silicon Power 128 GB card with one Samsung EVO 64GB card for 192GB of storage space?”Īt last! The PSP recognizes 175GB of usable space afte rmuch hassle, but it is slow and unreliable.

The first thing I did was format it to ext4 and then FAT32 for benchmarking and greater compatibility. The card come preformatted with exFAT, one of the most problematic and least compatible filesystems in existence for my uses. Both systems used the same CPU and had the same hardware specifications.ĭisks (Linux Mint 17.2 64-bit) 41.6 MB/s readĬrystalDiskMark (Windows 7 64-bit) 57.6 MB/s read For me, this card was no better than the Samsung 64GB Class 10 MicroSD card that offered 42 MB/s reads and 22 MB/s writes - twice as fast writing as the Silicon Power card.ĭisks and CrystalDiskMark produced very different results on average. I purchased this card based upon glowing reviews praising its superior speeds, but I had no such success. Apparently, the chosen filesystem matters little in the card’s performance. However, the Disks benchmark result was slightly worse than FAT32. Thinking that the filesystem might make a difference upon speed, I formatted the Silicon Power 128GB card to ext4.

Crystaldiskmarkwindows 10 64 bit